Prompt Optimization
Differences in Prompting Techniques: ChatGPT vs. Claude for Lifecycle Email Generation
When generating lifecycle emails with AI, both ChatGPT (OpenAI) and Claude (Anthropic) require thoughtful prompting but have distinct optimal styles due to differences in how each model is engineered and responds to guidance.
ChatGPT Prompting Techniques
Specificity and Structure Are Key: ChatGPT excels when given very clear, unambiguous prompts. Structure your request to specify format, tone, length, and sequence.
Example: “Write a five-step lifecycle email sequence for onboarding new SaaS users. For each email, list its goal, main message, and CTA. Keep the tone friendly and encouraging.”
Prompt Engineering Styles:
Few-Shot Prompting: Provide examples of desired outputs to establish a pattern.
Role Prompting: Ask it to act as a specific expert (e.g., “Act as a lifecycle marketing specialist...”).
Step-back/Chain-of-Thought: Request brainstorming or stepwise reasoning before writing.
System Prompting: Set strict formatting or sequence expectations.
Contextual Prompting: Add background on the product, audience, and goals for more tailored outputs.
Best For: Highly structured, technically specific, or compliance-driven email outputs. Works well for tasks where every detail needs control, like regulatory compliance or sequential flows.
Claude Prompting Techniques
Conversational and Context-Heavy: Claude is designed for more fluid, human-like dialogue. It responds well to prompts that give broad goals, allow for some interpretation, or invite brainstorming.
Example: “Let’s brainstorm a sequence of lifecycle emails for nurturing users after signup. What themes and touchpoints would you suggest to build a lasting relationship?”
Prompt Engineering Styles:
Open-Ended, Exploratory Prompts: Encourage the model to expand or elaborate (e.g., “What are some creative ideas for…?”).
Conversational Follow-Up: Reference previous context to keep continuity (“Building on what we discussed earlier…”).
Empathy and Ethics: When nuance or human touch is needed (“How could these emails make new users feel supported?”).
Flexible Instructions: Leave some aspects open for interpretation rather than specifying every detail.
Best For: Creative writing, empathetic tone, brainstorming new lifecycle approaches, or when emotional connection is vital. Especially useful for more narrative, brand-driven, or nuanced communications.
Key Differences Summarized
Prompt Structure
Explicit, detailed, and structured
Suggestive, open-ended, and conversational
Output Style
Precise, technical, formal possible
Fluid, creative, human-like dialogue
Best Use Cases
Stepwise sequences, compliance, A/B
Brainstorming, empathy, creative writing
Role Instruction
Highly effective (“Act as X expert”)
Works, but more natural with context
Continuity
Good, may lose context in long threads
Excels at ongoing, multi-turn context
Room for Flexibility
Less: over-specification preferred
More: open to interpretation
Nuance & Empathy
Sometimes less emotionally rich
Very good at warmth and conversational tone
Practical Prompting Tips
For ChatGPT: Use explicit, controlled prompts. Lay out sequence, structure, and constraints clearly. Examples, roles, and stepwise instructions help ensure emails align to business requirements.
For Claude: Be conversational and encourage interpretation—invite creative solutions or ethical considerations; refer back to prior responses for best results in ongoing sequences.
By adapting prompting style to each model’s strengths, marketers can generate lifecycle email campaigns that are optimized for tone, content quality, and effectiveness.
Last updated